A Labour Party in Tory clothing? Why Starmer's backbenchers are deeply uncomfortable
16 March 2025, 13:38 | Updated: 16 March 2025, 15:19
Since taking office nine months ago Sir Keir Starmer has weathered party rows about winter fuel payments, the two child benefit cap, WASPI women, airport expansion and cuts to international aid.
All of these decisions have been justified in the name of balancing the books - filling that notorious £22bn black hole, sticking to the fiscal rules, and in the pursuit of growth as the government's number one priority.
But welfare reform feels like a far more existential row.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting argued on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the current system is "unsustainable".
Ministers have been making the point for weeks that the health benefits bill for working-age people has ballooned by £20bn since the pandemic and is set to grow by another £18bn over the next five years, to £70bn.
But the detail of where those cuts could fall is proving highly divisive.
One proposal reportedly under consideration has been to freeze personal independence payments (PIPs) next year, rather than uprating them in line with inflation.
Charities have warned this would be a catastrophic real-terms cut to 3.6 million people.
Concerned left-wing backbenchers are calling on the government to tax the rich, not take from the most vulnerable.
The Sunday Times and Observer have now reported that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has dropped the idea in response to the backlash.
Read more:
Streeting denies Labour 'changing into Tories'
Planned PIP freeze set to be scrapped - reports
What cuts could be announced?
Wes Streeting denied reports of a cabinet row over the plan, insisting the final package of measures hasn't yet been published and he and his cabinet colleagues haven't seen it.
Not the final version perhaps - but given all backbench Labour MPs who were summoned to meetings with the Number 10 policy teams for briefings this week, that response is perhaps more than a little disingenuous.
In his interview with Sir Trevor Phillips, he went on to make the broader case for PIP reform - highlighting the thousand people who sign up to the benefit every day and arguing that the system needs to be "sustainable", to "deliver for those that need it most" and "provide the right kind of support for the different types of need that exist".
To me this signals the government are preparing to unveil a tighter set of PIP eligibility criteria, with a refocus on supporting those with the greatest needs.
Changes to incapacity benefit to better incentivise working - for those who can - are also clearly on the cards.
The health secretary has been hitting out at the "overdiagnosis" of mental health conditions, arguing that "going out to work is better for your mental and physical health, than being spent and being stuck at home", and promising benefit reforms that will help support people back to work rather than "trapped in the benefits system".
Turning Tory?
Starmer said this week the current welfare system couldn't be defended on economic or moral grounds.
The Conservatives don't disagree.
Before the election, they proposed £12bn in cuts to the welfare bill, with a focus on getting people on long-term sickness back to work.
This morning, shadow education secretary Laura Trott claimed Labour denied that welfare cuts were needed during the election campaign and had wasted time in failing to include benefits reform in the King's Speech.
"They're coming to this chaotically, too late and without a plan," she said.
